Wednesday, 4 December 2013

HCA held that the liquidator of a landlord company could disclaim landlord and tenants interests in lease

Please note for members of the public or practitioners in the legal profession where English is your second language a translation key in all languages of the world is available on this blog to assist you. The plain English blog without translation facilities is located at http://roberthaypropertybarrister.wordpress.com


The High Court today held 4:1 that the liquidator of a landlord company could disclaim both the landlord’s interest and the tenant’s interest in a lease.  See: Willmott Growers Group Inc v Willmott Forests Limited [2013] HCA 51. The decision will have significant implications for tenants and their financiers. Section 568(1) of the Corporations Act permits a liquidator to disclaim certain property of a company, including property that consists of a contract. French CJ, Hayne and Kiefel JJ held that a lease was a species of contract and that the leases which were the subject of the appeal were “property of the [landlord] company”  within the meaning of s.568. Their Honours rejected the contention that the disclaimer power applied only to leases to the company in liquidation and held that the rights of the landlord and tenant ceased from the date the disclaimer took effect. Gaegler J, who was in the majority, delivered a separate judgment. Keane J, in a powerful dissent,  held that a disclaimer could not divest rights that had already accrued such as the interest of a tenant. I will be writing further about this decision.



My clerk can be contacted via this link http://www.greenslist.com.au/ if you wish to retain my services for any legal matter which is within the gamut of my legal experience. 


Author: Robert Hays Barrister subject to copyright under DMCA.

2 comments:

  1. Very interesting and useful tips. Thanks for sharing this information....

    tenant landlord disputes

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting precedent. Thanks Robert!

    ReplyDelete