Please note for members of the public or practitioners in the legal profession where English is your second language a translation key in all languages of the world is available on this blog to assist you. The plain English blog without translation facilities is located at http://roberthaypropertybarrister.wordpress.com
Leases often provide that the landlord may re-enter premises and end the lease if a guarantor becomes bankrupt.
In N.C.Reid & Co Pty Ltd v Pencarl Pty Ltd  VCAT2241 the guarantor became bankrupt, the landlord re-entered the premises and leased the premises to a new tenant.
The existing tenant sought relief against forfeiture and/or damages.
The tenant claimed, among other things, that the landlord should have served a notice under s.146 of the Property Law Act 1958 because the lease had been terminated "for repudiation" with the consequence that the tenant would have had 14 days to remedy the breach.
The tenant's claim was unsuccessful. Judge O'Neill held that the lease had been terminated pursuant to a contractual right and not because of a repudiation of the lease and therefore a notice that complied with s.146 did not have to be served.
His Honour also said that in if there were a breach it could not have been rectified.
My clerk can be contacted via this link http://www.greenslist.com.au/ if you wish to retain my services for any legal matter which is within the gamut of my legal experience.
Author: Robert Hays Barrister subject to copyright under DMCA.