There is a translation key(widget) on this blog for ease of reading for non-English
speaking members of the public or professionals. http://roberthaybarrister.blogspot.com.au/
Traditionally leases in Victoria have not been registered because of the protection afforded by s. 42(2)(e) of the Transfer of Land Act 1958 which provides that :
"....land which is included in any folio of the Register or registered instrument shall be subject to -
(e) the interests of (but excluding any option to purchase) of a tenant in possession of the land;"
Because of s.42(2)(e) any purchaser of the relevant land was bound by the lease.
The reference to "tenant in possession" means a person in actual possession of the land. See: Burke v Dawes (1937-38) 59 CLR 1 at 17-18; Balanced Securities Ltd v Bianco [2010] VSC 162 at [79].
My clerk can be contacted via this link for bookings http://www.greenslist.com.au/
Certainly the cases above support the proposition that if your are in occupation (with a valid lease) that you are a tenant in possession. However they are silent as to the proposition that you need to be in occupation, rather than have the right to occupy under a valid lease, to be a tenant in possession.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing such a good thought, piece of writing is pleasant, thats why i
ReplyDeletehave read it fully